Monitoring • Evaluation • Reporting • Learning
Make every
indicator traceable.
Programme logic, indicators, evidence handling, reporting cadence and learning—connected as one operating system.
OS programme operating layer
From reporting chaos
to evidence control.
Move the divider. The work may be happening on both sides. The difference is whether the evidence can hold.
Reporting week becomes a rescue mission.
Files exist. Indicators drift. Nobody is certain which version is correct.
Evidence moves before the deadline does.
Ownership, verification and reporting cadence are designed into the programme.
The dashboard is
the last layer.
Not the first.
Evidence systems become credible when programme logic, indicator governance, capture rules, verification and reporting are connected underneath the interface.
Evidence should
come back into
the programme.
MERL only becomes valuable when reporting changes what happens next.
Start where the
system is weakest.
Current pricing is shown as a practical range; complexity depends on sites, indicators, cohorts and data sources.
Scoping Sprint
Logic review, evidence-risk scan, reporting cadence and a written build plan.
Evidence Backbone Build
Programme logic, indicator governance, evidence packs, proof discipline and reporting templates.
Reporting Partner
Monthly evidence checks, reporting support, indicator maintenance and quarterly learning loops.
Every claim should
know where its
evidence lives.
Evidence packs, naming rules, verification notes, sign-offs and version control make programme evidence easier to find, check and defend.
What would break
if a funder asked
“show me the proof?”
Start there. We will build the evidence system around it.
